Dear CCI Friends,

The information below is mind blowing. It appears proof that the “hacks” for which the Democrats have demonized Russia and Putin––they knew all along were bogus. The retired U.S. Veteran Intelligence officers have cracked this case. This should radically alter the world opinion regarding Russia and Washington.

Sharon

BTW, we took three of the Veteran Intelligence Officers, Ray McGovern, Elizabeth Murray and Ann Wright to Russia in June 2016.

Consortium News
July 24, 2017

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year.

MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?

Executive Summary

Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctored to incriminate Russia.

[Continue Reading]

Dear friends,

The impossible has happened. A leading mainstream media magazine, Newsweek, printed the article below which is full of truth uncommonly seen in American media in recent years.

Is hope on the horizon? Has fake news gone so far that someone in the middle of the disinformation world is taking a chance on getting relieved of his job … or hoping that others will follow suit?

Sharon

Newsweek
April 19, 2017

Why Rumors Of Russian Interference In The West Are Greatly Exaggerated

Sumantra Maitra

Russian hackers might have interfered in the Brexit vote, according to a committee of British MPs, in a somewhat bizarre but predictable claim. According to this new hypothesis, the U.K.’s “Register to Vote” website, which was temporarily down on June 7, 2016, the final day of registration before the Brexit vote, “might have” suffered a DDOS attack. While declining to categorically assert clear evidence of a foreign (Russian) hack, Bernard Jenkin, Chair of the House of Commons’ Public Accounts Select Committee, alluded to dark forces and botnets.

This is not new. In December, a Labour Party MP, Ben Bradshaw, stated that it is “highly probable” that Vladimir Putin interfered in the Brexit referendum. In the same speech, he also, rather bafflingly claimed Russia encouraged a huge flow of migrants from Syria to destabilize the EU.

[Continue Reading]

Friends, I take a non-partisan position on all issues at this point, but it appears that the “strike” on Syria is coming apart at the seams. Fortunately there were very few deaths and almost no structural damage occurred––the major loss was billions of tax dollars wasted in a spectacular aerial show, that made proponents of such madness feel that “America is Back.” It begs the question, who is pulling the strings behind both Democrats and Republicans that they would stand shoulder-to-shoulder to laud this warring insanity? I stand with Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard when she reminds that this is a totally illegal and unconstitutional act that both houses support–-that regime change MUST be stopped. I wonder how many of you out there stand with Congresswoman and Iraqi war veteran Tulsi Gabbard? Google her Youtubes, she is refreshingly honest and straight to the point.

Sharon

Countercurrents.org
April 13, 2017

MIT Rocket Scientist Questions White House Claims On Syria Chemical Attack

One of the world’s leading rocket scientists, national security advisor and MIT Professor Theodore Postol, who has won awards for debunking claims about missile defense systems and has been a scientific adviser to the US Chief of Naval Operations, says today in a nine-page report that a four-page report released by the Trump administration yesterday intended to blame the recent chemical attack in Syria on the Syrian government “does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack”.

[Continue Reading]

Dear Friends,

I’ve corresponded little while organizing by far the most complex trip to Russia of CCI’s 34-year history. We depart May 10 for ten regions in Russia on an assessment mission to uncover what’s fact and what’s fiction about Russia today.

While in the land of fairybook palaces and ballets, we have no cultural events on our schedule. Our time is organized to hear how Russian experts and business and professional Russians interpret events surrounding Russia’s role in the world today––what they think their government is up to and what they believe needs to happen to avoid nuclear annihilation. We hope to have time to post to this site daily while traveling. Eric Thierman, videographer, will capture presentations, discussions, debates and the words of Russians who are counterpart professionals to you readers of this site.

However in the interim, since information is coming out that isn’t in mainstream media, I’ll take time to share a bit of it with you. I’m particularly interested in the Veteran Intelligency Professionals, those who each served America for decades in the CIA, NSA and a splay of America’s top Intelligence operations. While our mainstream media, both Democrats and Republicans, are joining each other to support another war (perhaps WWIII), these American experts with long years of intelligence service are nowhere to be heard. Robert Parry, Harvard’s recipient of the Neiman Award for being the epitome of Investigative Journalism, brings us a very strong statement from 24 veteran American Intelligence officers.

We need to take these officers 15-points into consideration when taking in whatever shows up on our TV screens and print media.

Please slow down and study the information below,
Sharon

Consortiumnews.com
April 11, 2017

Friends, are we seeing a trilogy by accident here?  I think so ….
Gilbert Doctorow, PhD, with US and Belgian passports comments on the Foreign Affairs article.  Gil is an astute watcher of international affairs, particularly US-Russia relations. He gives us his immediate impressions after having just read the Foreign Affairs tome by Robert English and the NYT article by Boykewich.  Note that neither of these two articles is written by the usual crowd.  Are they floated out to test the mood of the country?  I think so …
Sharon

Lalibreblogs
March 18, 2017

Clearing space for a new foreign policy: the Establishment begins to stir

In this essay we consider why Foreign Affairs has just published an article on U.S. policy towards Russia that trashes the positions of all their featured contributors these past several years

Clearing space for a new foreign policy:  the Establishment begins to stir

by Gilbert Doctorow, Ph.D.

On March 10, the online edition of Foreign Affairs magazine published an article by Robert English, a professor of international relations at the University of Southern California, that all readers should look up to stay abreast of the fast evolving realignments within the U.S. foreign policy establishment  and to see better where we may be headed, even as many of his supporters are giving up too early on Donald Trump’s commitment and ability to change direction away from promotion of regime change and permanent warfare as the world’s sole policeman to a policy of détente and years of peace ahead.

See https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2017-03-10/russia-trump-and-new-d-tente 

The fact is that no about-face on US foreign and defense policy is possible without substantial support from the US political class.   We are not a dictatorship; we do not have an authoritarian system where the boss in the White House calls all the shots. The fight over foreign policy direction goes on in the public arena, and there have to be two sides in the ring with their dukes up. If Trump were to impose a new, radically different position without the ground being prepared in Congress, in the foreign policy community and through them in the broad public, he would be instantly thwarted and well on his way to impeachment.

[Continue Reading]